Anskaffelser i Akershus, Buskerud og Østfold KODrammenTED
External review of FRID IKS - DIO-competition ICT consultant
The Board of Frid IKS has undertaken an external review for an overall and objective evaluation of FRID IKS' activities. The review shall map the current situation, for example, how the value chains function in light of being an intermunicipal company and how FRID IKS safeguards the counties' expectations. Measures shall also be proposed ...
Type: Tender
Project Management, Digitalisation Consulting, Public Administration Consulting, Management Consulting
Unlock documents for free
No credit card · Instant access
Content at a glance
- Tender type:
- Tender
- Contracting authority:
- Anskaffelser i Akershus, Buskerud og Østfold KO
- Published:
- June 29, 2026
- Deadline:
- Not specified
- Topic:
- Project Management
Tender description
The Board of Frid IKS has undertaken an external review for an overall and objective evaluation of FRID IKS' activities. The review shall map the current situation, for example, how the value chains function in light of being an intermunicipal company and how FRID IKS safeguards the counties' expectations. Measures shall also be proposed that can strengthen areas where gaps are uncovered.
Further details
With free access, documents, deadlines and submission notes are available in a structured format.
- Core requirements of the tender prioritized and prepared
- Deadlines, eligibility criteria and documents in one workflow
- Guidance for structured bid preparation
- Automatically discover matching follow-up tenders
Unlock 30 days free
30 days free · no credit card · cancel anytime
All procurement details
Buyer, lots, participants, locations, documents, and procedure data have already been captured. Open any area to see the complete information in your workspace.
5 data areas available
Unlock 30 days free
30 days free · no credit card · cancel anytime
Documents
Unlock49 details capturedDocuments
Buyer
Unlock3 details capturedBuyer · Address · Contact
Lots
Unlock1 detail capturedLots LOT-0000
Procedure data
Unlock6 details capturedPublication number · Procedure reference · Buyer reference · Procedure type · +2 more
Bidders and contractors
Unlock3 details capturedBidders and contractors · Address · Contact
Related tenders
10Competition for the procurement of external resources for the coordination project
Statens innkjøpssenter v/DFØOsloDeadline: Jun 30The objective of the procurement is to enter into a contract for the delivery of external professional and methodic assistance for the Coordination Project in DFØ. The coordination project shall map and analyse coordination possibilities across DFØ ́s divisions and propose a prioritised list of relevant measures. The project will be carried out in three phases. Phase 2 (The current situation, June - November 2026) is the core delivery. The contract also includes an option for phase 3 (Vision and concepts, November 2026 - February 2027) and phase 4 (Gap-analyses and action plan, March-June 2027). The coordination project is a transverse project in DFØ that shall strengthen the co-ordination across the entity. The project is anchored in DFØ ́s business strategy 2025-2030 and the activity plan 2026, and the project ́s mandate has been decided in the management group. The aim is to increase DFØ ́s strategic scope of action by exploring and assessing how the entity is organised and how the resources are utilised across the divisions.Competition for the procurement of external resources for the coordination project
Statens innkjøpssenter v/DFØOsloThe objective of the procurement is to enter into a contract for the delivery of external professional and methodic assistance for the Coordination Project in DFØ. The coordination project shall map and analyse coordination possibilities across DFØ ́s divisions and propose a prioritised list of relevant measures. The project will be carried out in three phases. Phase 2 (The current situation, June - November 2026) is the core delivery. The contract also includes an option for phase 3 (Vision and concepts, November 2026 - February 2027) and phase 4 (Gap-analyses and action plan, March-June 2027). The coordination project is a transverse project in DFØ that shall strengthen the co-ordination across the entity. The project is anchored in DFØ ́s business strategy 2025-2030 and the activity plan 2026, and the project ́s mandate has been decided in the management group. The aim is to increase DFØ ́s strategic scope of action by exploring and assessing how the entity is organised and how the resources are utilised across the divisions.Call for External Collaborator – to map process workflows and procedures of labour rights monitoring mechanisms in the Philippines
ILONepalDeadline: Aug 27Dear Bidder, The International Labour Office (ILO) is looking for an individual to undertake work as an External Collaborator. Below is a summary of the work to be performed: The consultant will assess labour rights and freedom of association (FOA) monitoring mechanisms in the Philippines through two interrelated components: (1) mapping and analysing the workflows, procedures and coordination arrangements of existing labour and human rights monitoring mechanisms; and (2) developing institutional options, including the possible operationalization of an independent, non-judicial body, in line with the 2023 ILO High-Level Tripartite Mission (HLTM) recommendations. The assignment will review relevant laws, policies and procedures and consult key stakeholders, including CHR, EO 23 IAC, AO 35 IAC, NTIPC-MB/RTMBs and other relevant bodies. It will map the lifecycle of labour rights and FOA-related cases, from reporting and intake through investigation, referral, monitoring, remedies, resolution and follow-up, including coordination, information-sharing and case management arrangements. The consultant will identify gaps, overlaps, bottlenecks and data management challenges and assess existing mechanisms against the functions envisioned by the HLTM. Based on the findings, the consultant will recommend institutional arrangements to strengthen coordination, case management, data sharing, access to remedies and accountability. Outputs will include validated process maps, assessment reports, institutional recommendations, implementation options and supporting documentation. If you are interested, please express interest and follow the instructions attached to consult the detailed terms of reference and other relevant information in the ILO e-sourcing platform. Please submit your proposal before the specified deadline. Thank you.Local Consultancy: Assessment of PPCU Capacity, Gaps and PMEAL Requirements
UNDPJordanDeadline: Sep 04SCOPE OF TENDER The overall objective of the assignment is to undertake a comprehensive institutional, technical and capacity needs assessment of the PPCU and develop a practical, costed roadmap for strengthening its role as a national delivery and performance management function within the Prime Minister’s Office, in line with the February 2026 Cabinet Retreat resolution on Deliverology and Execution Architecture, including needs for planning, monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning. Where possible recommendation for automation needs of the Unit and workflows should be identified. Specific Objectives:Assess the PPCU’s institutional positioning, functional responsibilities, staffing profile, workflows, coordination routines and reporting arrangements.Identify institutional, technical, human resource, operational and systems capacity gaps affecting the PPCU’s ability to coordinate, monitor and accelerate priority Government delivery commitments.Determine the PPCU’s training and capacity development requirements in delivery chain management, results-based management, adaptive management, policy implementation tracking, performance reporting, data use, stakeholder coordination and learning.Review the alignment between the PPCU’s delivery function and MEPD’s aid coordination, national planning and NDP monitoring architecture, in line with the Cabinet Retreat resolution on Programme-Based Planning and Coordination, and recommend practical arrangements to clarify roles, workflows and information exchange.Assess planning, monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning needs, including where possible recommendations for automation, dashboard requirements, data flows, reporting templates, interoperability needs, governance arrangements and user requirements.Develop a practical, sequenced and costed roadmap for capacitation, automation and institutional strengthening of the PPCU.Ensure that proposed recommendations integrate gender equality, equity, disability inclusion and Leave No One Behind principles, including the use of disaggregated data and inclusive stakeholder engagement.Scope of work: The firm shall undertake a structured diagnostic and design assignment covering institutional assessment, business process review, stakeholder consultations, capacity needs analysis, digital readiness assessment, automation requirements and roadmap development. The scope shall include, but not be limited to, the following tasks:Review relevant national policy, planning, delivery and monitoring documents, including the February 2026 Cabinet Retreat Declaration and resolutions, Government Programme of Action, National Development Plan, Cabinet delivery commitments, PPCU mandate documents, reporting templates, policy tracking tools, previous UNDP-supported PPCU work and relevant MEPD aid coordination and monitoring materials.Map the PPCU’s current functions, workflows, reporting lines, decision-making routines, escalation pathways, stakeholder interfaces, data sources and internal operating procedures.Assess the PPCU’s institutional capacity, including structure, staffing, skills mix, coordination arrangements, decision-making authority, tools, data systems, performance routines and resource requirements.Identify bottlenecks affecting delivery chain management, including delays in reporting, weak data quality, unclear accountability, fragmented coordination, limited analytical capacity, insufficient follow-up routines and gaps in escalation mechanisms.The firm shall design and facilitate a multi-stakeholder Delivery Clinic bringing together the Prime Minister’s Office, PPCU, Ministry of Economic Planning and Development, Ministry of Finance, selected priority sector ministries and other relevant institutions to jointly define the proposed Delivery Unit’s scope, mandate, operating model, governance arrangements, delivery routines, escalation pathways and linkages to priority sector ministries, thereby strengthening whole-of-governmeNational Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Sustainable Finance Specialist
UNDPJordanDeadline: Aug 28Description of the Assignment: Objective The Project will engage a National PPP Sustainable Finance Specialist to lead the review and enhancement of the Sustainable Financing Manual for PPP Projects (the “Manual”) developed in-house prior to its publication as a PPP knowledge product. The Manual will serve as an investment readiness guide that enables the PPPC and implementing agencies to structure PPP projects capable of attracting financing from domestic and international providers of sustainable finance. Specifically, the Manual shall strengthen the capacity of the PPPC and implementing agencies to:improve the investment readiness and bankability of climate-smart and nature-positive PPP projects;identify and access appropriate sustainable finance instruments throughout the PPP lifecycle;align PPP projects with the requirements of commercial lenders, institutional investors, multilateral development banks (MDBs), development finance institutions (DFIs), impact investors, and sustainable capital markets; andmobilize private sector investments that generate climate, biodiversity, and social outcomesThe review and enhancement shall include:A stocktaking of sustainable finance instruments, facilities, and financing mechanisms relevant to PPP projects in the Philippines, including green, climate, biodiversity, blue, blended, sustainability-linked, ESG-linked, and transition finance, validating the instruments currently addressed and extending coverage to those not yet included.An assessment of the eligibility requirements, investment criteria, environmental and social safeguards, disclosure requirements, reporting obligations, and due diligence expectations associated with relevant sustainable finance instruments, identifying key considerations across these instrument categoriesA review and refinement of guidance on integrating sustainable finance considerations throughout the Philippine PPP lifecycle, from project identification and development to structuring, procurement, implementation, monitoring, and post-award management—building upon existing PPPC tools and guidelines. An expanded treatment of guidance on transforming climate, environmental, biodiversity, and social development objectives into investable and bankable PPP opportunities.Identification of at least four priority sectors where sustainable finance application is most feasible, together with sector-specific guidance on financing options, project structuring, and investment readiness, validating the Manuals existing illustrative cases against this prioritization and refining or supplementing them as needed. For each priority sector, at least one existing PPP pipeline project shall be identified and used as an illustrative example to demonstrate the application of appropriate sustainable finance instruments and financing structures.Guidance on enhancing the bankability of NbS and climate-smart PPP projects, including approaches such as ecosystem service valuation, natural capital valuation, avoided-cost methodologies, Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES), carbon and biodiversity markets, concessional finance, blended finance, guarantees, viability gap funding, and other innovative financing mechanisms.Updated and/or expanded case studies and illustrative financing pathways demonstrating how PPP projects can access and combine different sustainable finance instruments.Scope of Work Given the indicative scope of the revised manual, the PPP Sustainable Financing Specialist will undertake the following tasks:Conduct a technical review of the Manual to assess its content, structure, technical rigor, alignment with international sustainable finance practices, and applicability relative to the objectives of this assignment (see Annex A).Conduct inception meetings with the PPPC and UNDP to validate the objectives, scope, methodology, workplan, and overall design of the Manual.Prepare an Assessment Report summarizing the review of findings and setting out the recommendatDevelopment of a green corridor project and street design training in Dakar
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbHEschbornDeadline: Aug 21Prepare a pre-feasibility study for a Green Corridor to improve safe pedestrian access to public transport in Keur Massar and strengthen institutional capacities for climate-resilient, inclusive street design and participatory project development in Dakar. WP1 Baseline study - Review existing data and studies; identify gaps; conduct additional data collection (e.g. traffic counts, user surveys, air quality and environmental measurements). - Analyse urban context and land use; travel demand (quantitative and qualitative); supply quality and capacity for all modes; safety and conflicts; environmental quality; climate stress (heat, flooding); gender and social inclusion; institutional and legal framework; state-of-the-art references (incl. regional examples). - Deliverables: D1.1 Methodological orientation (inception) report; D1.2 Baseline report; D1.3 Slide deck; D1.4 Provision of raw, machine-readable and editable data and media. WP2 Participation process - Map stakeholders (incl. vulnerable groups, women, persons with disabilities, street vendors, informal transport, neighbourhood groups, local and national authorities). - Design and implement an inclusive, gender-responsive participation strategy (incl. at least one virtual measure); facilitate workshops, mediation as needed; document and evaluate results. - Deliverables: D2.1 Stakeholder analysis (report); D2.2 Slides; D2.3 Participation Strategy; D2.4 Facilitation materials/templates (editable); D2.5 Results report with inputs for corridor requirements; D2.6 Reference Toolkit for participatory processes (FR/EN) to enable replication. WP3 Pre-feasibility Study (PFS) Green Corridor - Identify and appraise design/traffic management alternatives; SWOT; recommend preferred alternative in consultation with CETUD and local administrations. - Produce ?15 preliminary and 10 final conceptual designs (street sections/intersections, allocation of road space, speeds, traffic regulation, gSenior Procurement Expert (Judiciary) for the EU-PH Public Procurement Project
UNDPJordanDeadline: Sep 04Description of the Assignment: Under the overall guidance and supervision of the EU-PH Public Procurement Project Manager and the Team Leader of the Institutions and Partnerships (I&P) Programme Team of UNDP Philippines, the Consultant shall undertake the following: 1. Submit an Inception Report. Detail the overall approach, design considerations, and schedule for the duration of the engagement. The document must outline methodology for conducting a rapid institutional appraisal, focusing on evaluating NGPA readiness and mapping comprehensive capacity development needs (encompassing skills, processes, and institutional systems) for the Supreme Court (SC).2. Conduct Policy and NGPA Readiness Review. Analyze the NGPA and its Implementing Rules and Regulations. The Consultant will identify specific NGPA provisions with the highest implementation impact on the Judiciary. Based on these provisions, the Consultant must determine the critical institutional shifts, new competencies, and systemic capabilities required for procuring entities to successfully transition from the GPRA framework to the NGPA. 3. Perform a Rapid Capacity and NGPA Readiness Assessment. Conduct key informant interviews and data collection with the Head of the Procuring Entity, Bids and Awards Committees, Technical Working Groups, end-users/implementing units, and the Procurement Management Division or contracting officers across the SC. To ensure a comprehensive analysis, data collection shall include a targeted and representative sample of lower courts in the assessment. The Consultant shall propose the number and composition of the interviews, focus group discussions, and consultations in the Inception Report, subject to UNDP approval. The Consultant will also engage with key oversight and specialized bodies, specifically the Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM), Government Procurement Policy Board Technical Support Office (GPPB-TSO), and the Commission on Audit (COA). The goal is to evaluate current institutional procurement practices, identify operational bottlenecks, and assess the overall readiness of these institutions to implement NGPA reforms. 4. Execute a Gap Analysis. Synthesize the findings to map the current capabilities of the SC against the new legal and operational requirements of the NGPA. Drawing on inputs from the procuring entities as well as COA and GPPB-TSO, the Consultant will identify common procurement issues that trigger audit findings or disputes. The Consultant will also highlight critical vulnerabilities in both human resources (e.g., skills and knowledge gaps) and institutional processes (e.g., coordination, documentation, and systems). All identified gaps and vulnerabilities must be prioritized according to risk level (High, Medium, Low) and implementation urgency to directly inform the transition roadmap. 5. Develop a Comprehensive Capacity Development Framework and Roadmap. Design a holistic, tailor-fit capacity building architecture for NGPA implementation. This package must include:• Capacity Development Framework: A strategic mapping that addresses both institutional strengthening (e.g., process improvements, coordination mechanisms) and individual competency development aligned with NGPA standards.• Fit-for-Purpose NGPA Transition Roadmap: A sequenced reform and capacity-building plan, ensuring a dedicated track specifically designed for the Judiciary. This must include indicative timelines categorized as short-term (0-6 months), medium-term (6-18 months), and long-term (18-24 months), explicitly aligned with both the remaining NGPA transition period and timelines of the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations (SPJI) 2022-2027.• Detailed Module & Intervention Outlines: Comprehensive blueprints for proposed training modules and other Capacity Development interventions (e.g., mentoring, toolkits). These outlines must explicitly detail learning objectives, target audiences, and core NGPA topConsultancy Services for Fund Management of three new Business Instruments
Ministry of Foreign AffairsCopenhagenDeadline: Aug 04The Ministry of foreign Affairs, Green Diplomacy and Climate wishes to engage a Consultant (Fund Manager) to implement three business support instruments (E1, E2, and E4) as part of the Danish Government’s Strategy for Development Cooperation, “A Changing World”, appeals to Danish private companies and investors to increase their engagement and investment in the Global South, helping bridge gaps and contribute to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including climate action. The vision is that businesses which invest and expand their commercial engagements in the Global South will make significant contributions to national development agendas, including jobs, income opportunities through development of sustainable local value-chains, economic and social spin-offs from increased salaries and taxes, innovation, new technologies, and productivity-enhancements, and expansion in services. More specifically, the Strategy along with the Danish Government’s Action Plan for Effective and Economic Diplomacy seek to leverage the shared space between development cooperation and economic diplomacy, by promoting Danish companies’ investments and trade in developing partner countries. To this end, the Danish Government has initiated an initiative to strengthen business support through five business support instruments. The instruments are designed with focus on making it easier and more attractive for Danish companies to engage in emerging and developing markets, by reducing risks and clarifying and activating market potentials through partnerships, pilot projects, and business instruments providing co-investment financing and technical advice. The total amount allocated for the total initiative is DKK 850 million, of which DKK 550 million is allocated for instruments related to this tender. The five instruments focus on: E1) Early pipeline development to enlarge the pool of viable business cases; E2) Development, testing, and launching of inclusive and sustainable business models through partnerships between Danish businesses and non-commercial actors; E3) Access to finance, better enabling companies to invest and do business in high-risk Global South markets; E4) Demonstrating scalable, private sector-developed solutions with and for public authorities; and E5) Leveraging private and philanthropic capital. The five instruments are designed and should to the extent possible be managed to ensure synergies and coherence, both mutually and with the wider set of Danish private sector support engagements. The implementation of instruments E1, E2, and E4 will be managed under a Fund Management (FM) contract (Agreement) while instrument E3 and E5 will be managed by Impact Fund Denmark. This reflects a wish to concentrate the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ role on the policy and strategic management functions and to externalise the administrative and operational management functions to implementing agents. The purpose of the Agreement is to carry out the implementation and management of the three instruments, E1, E2, and E4, based on the underlying project documents and MFA Aid Management Guidelines (AMG). The Consultant will provide effective, transparent and accountable challenge fund management, covering proactive outreach and communication; call and application process implementation; contracting of selected actors/partnerships; supervision, guidance, and technical and project management backstopping of projects supported; administrative and financial management at facility level; results management and monitoring at level of each instrument; learning across the portfolio; and risk management. The objective of the Agreement is to manage and implement effectively and with accountability and transparency instruments E1, E2, and E4 and to achieve their defined objectives and results and in compliance with the MFA AMG. The Consultant’s overall tasks are: • Manage the full grant cycles of the instruments based on the project documents, including the application/call processes, with focus on efficient management, effectiveness, and accountability for funds and results. • Provide all administration of the funds including overall financial management, controls including state subsidy compliance, and verification and approval of project workplans, budgets, and reports as well as disbursements to the actors which, depending on the case, is the sole grantee, or in case of partnerships, the appointed administrative partner (commercial or non-commercial). • Provide for achievement of results as defined in the Results Framework in project documents of the instruments. • Provide outreach and communication to relevant segments of commercial actors including small/medium-size enterprises, highlight positive lessons, and ensure sharing of relevant knowledge and information that generate interest and effective participation in the instruments. • Provide relevant business and project management support and guidance to actors supported under the instruments. • Provide overall quality assurance of projects supported. • Maintain full compliance with MFA AMG and FMG, ensuring high standards of financial management, procurement, anti-corruption, and risk mitigation. • Provide relevant information and data to KLIMA on concrete projects and overall status based on request and through half annual and yearly reporting and meetings. • In relation to mid-term review or other MFA monitoring activities implement recommendations. The Agreement is divided into two phases. Phase 1 will cover the period 2027-2030 with an optional phase 2 covering up to 2035 guided by a planned mid-term review in 2029.Development of a green corridor project and street design training in Dakar
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbHEschbornDeadline: Aug 28Prepare a pre-feasibility study for a Green Corridor to improve safe pedestrian access to public transport in Keur Massar and strengthen institutional capacities for climate-resilient, inclusive street design and participatory project development in Dakar. WP1 Baseline study - Review existing data and studies; identify gaps; conduct additional data collection (e.g. traffic counts, user surveys, air quality and environmental measurements). - Analyse urban context and land use; travel demand (quantitative and qualitative); supply quality and capacity for all modes; safety and conflicts; environmental quality; climate stress (heat, flooding); gender and social inclusion; institutional and legal framework; state-of-the-art references (incl. regional examples). - Deliverables: D1.1 Methodological orientation (inception) report; D1.2 Baseline report; D1.3 Slide deck; D1.4 Provision of raw, machine-readable and editable data and media. WP2 Participation process - Map stakeholders (incl. vulnerable groups, women, persons with disabilities, street vendors, informal transport, neighbourhood groups, local and national authorities). - Design and implement an inclusive, gender-responsive participation strategy (incl. at least one virtual measure); facilitate workshops, mediation as needed; document and evaluate results. - Deliverables: D2.1 Stakeholder analysis (report); D2.2 Slides; D2.3 Participation Strategy; D2.4 Facilitation materials/templates (editable); D2.5 Results report with inputs for corridor requirements; D2.6 Reference Toolkit for participatory processes (FR/EN) to enable replication. WP3 Pre-feasibility Study (PFS) Green Corridor - Identify and appraise design/traffic management alternatives; SWOT; recommend preferred alternative in consultation with CETUD and local administrations. - Produce ?15 preliminary and 10 final conceptual designs (street sections/intersections, allocation of road space, speeds, traffic regulation, green infrastructure, lighting/shadingMigration of the accounting system UNIT4 to the tenderer's cloud system for Helse Nord.
SYKEHUSINNKJØP HFVADSØThe justification for awarding to the Contracting Authority assesses that there is a basis for entering into a temporary contract directly with Vivicta AS. The contracting authority will not use this notice as a final choice for future administrative digital target architecture, system model or contract structure. Future strategic direction shall be assessed through a separate management process, market dialogue and any procurements. The justification for the temporary contract is that the contracting authority is in a forced continuity situation connected to the existing production system. The situation is triggered by the manufacturer/supplier ́s technological direction and information that the current delivery platform cannot be continued unlimited. At the same time, future strategic direction for the administrative system landscape is not finally defined. Within the available timeframe, the contracting authority ́s assessment is not a real and reliable alternative that can ensure a continuation of the existing production system and the accompanying performance critical administrative core functions without unacceptable operational risk. The existing system has been established, configured and integrated over a long period of time. It is included in ongoing finance, invoice, reporting, integration and data basis processes. The system has integrations, data, roles, access structures, reporting set-up and management routines that are connected to the existing delivery model and the tenderer's operational and management responsibilities. The contracting authority will assess that clarification of future target architecture, market dialogue and any procurements for this system area will require considerable time. A procurement process is expected to take at least 12 months, and subsequent implementation, migration, testing, training, integration work and production will normally require a further 12-24 months. An immediate competition for full compensation or future target architecture will therefore not be able to help the acute continuity need. Alternative suppliers will also not be able to take over responsibility for the existing production system in a proper manner within the available deadline, without access to the necessary rights, system competence, operational environment, history, configuration, integration knowledge and supplier specific management competence. The agreement is, therefore, time-limited to what is deemed necessary to ensure reliable operation and continuity of the existing production system and the accompanying business critical administrative functions until the contracting authority has completed strategic clarification, market dialogue and any procurements. The agreement period is 3 years, which is the minimum time for binding. Legal basis The contracting authority assesses that the terms for direct contract award are fulfilled for the temporary contract. The legal basis will particularly be assessed against the procurement regulations § 13-4 letter b no. 2 and/or no. 3, where the procurement without a competition can be used when the service can only be delivered by a specific supplier for technical reasons or due to sole rights, provided that there are no reasonable alternatives and that the missing competition is not due to the contracting authority having adapted the procurement to a specific tenderer. The contracting authority emphasises that the assessment concerns a narrow and temporary continuation of the existing production system and associated activity critical administrative functions in a limited transition period. This does not apply to a general assessment of the market for future administrative digital systems and it does not involve a permanent choice of future platform, system architecture or supplier. The contracting authority estimates that at the time of the temporary contract there is not a reasonable and reliable alternative to Vivicta AS in order to ensure continuity of the existing ERP system in the period. The lack of competition is related to time critical and technical/operational continuation of an established production system, not to the contracting authority ́s future strategic needs. Subsidially, the need will also be assessed in light of the narrow exception rules on time-critical conditions and the necessary measures to safeguard continuity, but the contracting authority places decisive emphasis on the contract being for the technical and operational continuation of the existing system, not permanent choice of future ERP system.
Frequently asked questions about this tender
- How can I apply for this tender?
- Create a free account on Auftrag One. You will then see all documents, deadlines and submission notes in a structured workflow.
- What is the submission deadline?
- No specific submission deadline is currently stated for this notice.
- Who is the contracting authority?
- The contracting authority is Anskaffelser i Akershus, Buskerud og Østfold KO.
- Which documents are needed to get started?
- Typically you need the service description, proof of eligibility, deadline notes and possibly form sheets. On Auftrag One these items are displayed in prioritized order.